One nation, under God...

March 21, 2009 at 12:15 a.m. by Luke Graybill

I am probably safe in saying that nearly every single American reading this post will have had the Pledge of Allegiance burned into their rote memory early enough in their lives that they may not remember ever not knowing it.

I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands: one Nation under God, indivisible, with Liberty and Justice for all.

Given the general topics that I deal with on my blog, it should come as no surprise that I am quite interested in the particular phrase "under God" in the Pledge. I have often heard people mistakenly point to the Pledge as evidence that America is a Christian nation, a sentiment which is usually intended as a bludgeon to stamp out the heathens in our midst, or at the very least to cast judgment down upon them.

Equally as often, I have also heard that this phrase was added to the Pledge of Allegiance, "sometime in the 1950's." Never one to simply accept what others tell me, I did some research to find the facts on this issue.

The original Pledge of Allegiance, written by Francis Bellamy in August 1892, read like this:

I pledge allegiance to my Flag and the Republic for which it stands, one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.

He wrote the Pledge while serving as chairman in a committee affiliated with the National Education Association, intending it to be recited by children in public schools during the celebration of Columbus Day that year. Interestingly, he wanted to use the words "equality" and "fraternity" somewhere in the Pledge as well, but decided not to because he was worried that it would not be accepted by the many bigots that surrounded him.

A most interesting insight into Mr. Bellamy's literary and creative inspiration is revealed in his own recounting of the meaning behind the Pledge of Allegiance:

It began as an intensive communing with salient points of our national history, from the Declaration of Independence onwards; with the makings of the Constitution...with the meaning of the Civil War; with the aspiration of the people...

The true reason for allegiance to the Flag is the 'republic for which it stands.' ...And what does that vast thing, the Republic mean? It is the concise political word for the Nation - the One Nation which the Civil War was fought to prove. To make that One Nation idea clear, we must specify that it is indivisible, as Webster and Lincoln used to repeat in their great speeches. And its future?

Just here arose the temptation of the historic slogan of the French Revolution which meant so much to Jefferson and his friends, 'Liberty, equality, fraternity.' No, that would be too fanciful, too many thousands of years off in realization. But we as a nation do stand square on the doctrine of liberty and justice for all... source

Considering that even when Martin Luther King invoked the same sentiments of brotherhood and equality in the 1960's, they were still very controversial, I view Mr. Bellamy as quite progressive for his time. I wonder what someone of his caliber would say about a modern issue like equal treatment under the law for homosexuals? How has America measured up to his prediction that it would take "many thousands of years" to realize equality for all? But I digress..

Now we approach the addition of the crucial phrase that helps to enable bigoted religious fundamentals to justify their behavior. In 1951, the Knights of Columbus, a Catholic organization, decided to actively lobby President Eisenhower and the Congress to officially amend the Pledge of Allegiance to include the words "under God". The Knights failed for years, but the president was finally convinced on February 7th, 1954 during a sermon at the New York Avenue Presbyterian Church. The week after, Republican Charles Oakman addressed the Speaker of the House:

Last Sunday, the President of the United States and his family occupied the pew where Abraham Lincoln worshipped. The pastor, the Reverend George M. Docherty, suggested the change in our Pledge of Allegiance that I have offered [as a bill]. Dr. Docherty delivered a wise sermon. He said that as a native of Scotland come to these shores he could appreciate the pledge as something more than a hollow verse taught to children for memory. I would like to quote from his words. He said, 'there was something missing in the pledge, and that which was missing was the characteristic and definitive factor in the American way of life.' Mr. Speaker, I think Mr. Docherty hit the nail square on the head. source

On June 14th of 1954, President Eisenhower signed into law the bill which added the words "under God" to the Pledge of Allegiance.

Recently, this phrasing has come under scrutiny and legal challenge from parents concerned that their children were being taught and required to participate in what amounts to prayer in public school. In 2002, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Pledge of Allegiance is unconstitutional in it's current form to be promoted in public schools.

A profession that we are a nation 'under God' is identical ... to a profession that we are a nation 'under Jesus,' a nation 'under Vishnu,' a nation 'under Zeus,' or a nation 'under no god.' source

Thankfully, it appears that America's Pledge of Allegiance may end up returning to a form closer to it's original in the years to come. Most important to me is the opportunity through my research to educate those who are ignorant of the facts, and to remove one more weapon from the arsenal of the fundamentalist zealots.

Classified as: Religion, Politics

Comments

Comment from Gracie Marie , March 21, 2009 at 11 a.m.

I think this boy hits the nail! even our kids are suffering becuase we are taking God away from school. I found this and I have it in my home and my kids and I say moring and night.

written by a 15 year old in AZ

Since the Pledge of Allegiance And The Lord's Prayer Are not allowed in most Public schools anymore Because the word 'God' is mentioned... A kid in Arizona wrote the attached

NEW School prayer : Now I sit me down in school Where praying is against the rule For this great nation under God Finds mention of Him very odd.

If Scripture now the class recites, It violates the Bill of Rights. And anytime my head I bow Becomes a Federal matter now.

Our hair can be purple, orange or green, That's no offense; it's a freedom scene. The law is specific, the law is precise. Prayers spoken aloud are a serious vice.

For praying in a public hall Might offend someone with no faith at all. In silence alone we must meditate, God's name is prohibited by the state.

We're allowed to cuss and dress like freaks, And pierce our noses, tongues and cheeks. They've outlawed guns, but FIRST the Bible. To quote the Good Book makes me liable.

We can elect a pregnant Senior Queen, And the 'unwed daddy,' our Senior King. It's 'inappropriate' to teach right from wrong, We're taught that such 'judgments' do not belong.

We can get our condoms and birth controls, Study witchcraft, vampires and totem poles. But the Ten Commandments are not allowed, No word of God must reach this crowd.

It's scary here I must confess, When chaos reigns the school's a mess. So, Lord, this silent plea I make: Should I be shot; My soul please take! Amen

If you aren't ashamed to do this, Please pass this on. Jesus said, 'If you are ashamed of me, I will be ashamed of you before my Father

AMEN

Comment from Luke Graybill, March 21, 2009 at 11:17 a.m.

@Gracie Marie:

If children want to pray in public school, that's fine; but when the teachers encourage it, that is unconstitutional. Everyone is free to hold whatever religious beliefs they wish, but it is unconstitutional for any government service to encourage one above any other.

Welcome to the United States.

Comment from Dusty Smith, May 28, 2009 at 5:38 p.m.

Brilliant article. I am going to bookmark it and refer to it when ever I encounter anyone using this ridiculous argument.

Although, I do agree that this is a Christian nation. It wasn't meant to be this way, and it wasn't always this way, but it is definitely a Christian nation now. The debate is whether it should be or not. And I think it's very obvious to anyone paying attention that it definitely should not be. If over 500,00 dead Iraqis are not enough to convince you that this "Christian Nation" is a monster, nothing is likely to.

Dusty Smith http://www.cultofdusty.com

Comment from Luke Graybill, May 29, 2009 at 2:06 a.m.

Thanks for the positive feedback, and for the shout-out on Twitter, Dusty. I highly enjoy your blog as well, and am currently enjoying the banter happening in the comments there :)

Comment from Xavier_Onassis, July 1, 2009 at 12:28 p.m.

The Pledge of Allegiance is a patriotic oath to support the country and its iconic symbol, the flag. I have never understood what claiming allegiance to the country or a flag has to do with a Supreme Being. One can be a patriot and be a believer, and one can be a patriot and a non-believer. If there is an omniscient Deity, then the nation is under Him. If there is none, saying that the country is "under God" will not cause Him to materialize.

It stands to reason that if God is an eternal, omniscient and omnipresent Being, He surely knows what He is, and has no real need to have His ego stroked by a bunch of schoolchildren as they recognize the unity of their country.

I find it curious strange that the many descriptions of God seem to imply that God does not actually follow the Golden Rule. The Bible seems to suggests that if one does not attend keep the Sabbath or prays to some other (nonexistent) deity, He will send one to eternal hellfire and damnation.

I doubt that most people are really so petty as to treat their dog or cat to eternal torture if they cozy up to another human, if they fail to perform ritual adulation and repentance on a regular basis, or spend Sunday (or Saturday, there seems to be some confusion when the Sabbath is) at the beach rather than sitting in a hard pew and singing songs with archaic syntax.

I think that at the very least, we should assume that God treats his creations in a way that follows the Golden Rule, which was His idea in the first place.

Write a new comment

(optional - not shared)
(optional)

Markdown formatting is enabled for your body text.

Prove that you're not a robot..